What is the role of sex in informal relationships and relationships and how serious it is dissimilar for each type of relationship?
I received an amazing email last week to raise a question about the meaning of “causality” and “serious relationship”. I have several ideas about this, but I’d like to throw you all for your thoughts too. You can also see several gay men for sex tonight.
The person who posted the question thought that for her, a informal relationship becomes a grave relationship when sex tonight comes into play. The person she had a discussion on this subject, a man optional that even relaxed relationships could be sexual.
Sex can be nearby in the laid-back attitude, but for many, this can be seen as something more, a man would do in place of a woman. The quarrel is often here that although the sex of a man can be a purely physical act of sex in night with a woman is always touching. The truth of the substance is that I consider that sex can be bodily as a woman.
Equally, if sex in a serious relationship is more likely to be an emotional event for both in the relationship is now less on satisfying a self-centered need to find physical sex and more than a representation of love a individual and care another in which sex becomes a selfless act for somebody else.
So what is the meaning of “relationship”? This sent me running to the dictionary, which says, among other things, that “the relationship is a moving link between dating men sometimes with sex.” Obviously, there can be many types of relationships between people but I guess I typically think of as an intimate association between two people and if it is harsh then you may not actually have sex.
This is not the sole criterion for same-sex couples are likely not present at all, however, the couple has a serious relationship. So, the reader also suggested, “there is no answer, because of our gender bias (or desires),” but an issue that is very useful to open the discussion.